Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deleted Member 3a5v73x" data-source="post: 734842">Seems like a believable score from Webroot, I wish sometimes these independent AV tests labs test Webroot &quot;journaling&quot; after 24/48h, that is a &quot;rollback&quot;, when as soon as Cloud has determined that program is malicious, Webroot will automatically put those monitored programs in &quot;Blocked&quot; status and will initiate reversal of any actions. I&#039;ve seen myself Webroot recovering system from a Cerber encryption, but that was more than a 48h after. It is actually hard to test Webroot&#039;s malware protection effectiveness properly. Anyway, who would relay on a encrypted systems &quot;rollback&quot; by a 3th party AV rather than doing clean install of Windows after? I wouldn&#039;t, because traces of malware remnants might still be left on the system.No questions about other AV vendors in this test, ESET is where it should be at and have proven over these years to be a reliable, stable and strong 3th party AV company. I don&#039;t get why some of you are so surprised about that, one should have followed ESET&#039;s history.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deleted Member 3a5v73x, post: 734842"] Seems like a believable score from Webroot, I wish sometimes these independent AV tests labs test Webroot "journaling" after 24/48h, that is a "rollback", when as soon as Cloud has determined that program is malicious, Webroot will automatically put those monitored programs in "Blocked" status and will initiate reversal of any actions. I've seen myself Webroot recovering system from a Cerber encryption, but that was more than a 48h after. It is actually hard to test Webroot's malware protection effectiveness properly. Anyway, who would relay on a encrypted systems "rollback" by a 3th party AV rather than doing clean install of Windows after? I wouldn't, because traces of malware remnants might still be left on the system. No questions about other AV vendors in this test, ESET is where it should be at and have proven over these years to be a reliable, stable and strong 3th party AV company. I don't get why some of you are so surprised about that, one should have followed ESET's history. [/QUOTE]

Verification