Hope you all enjoyed the video Thanks for watching :)
safe1st Level 17 Thread author Verified Top Poster Well-known Jan 29, 2016 812 Nov 23, 2016 #1 Hope you all enjoyed the video Thanks for watching Reactions: Solarquest, sap, Overkill and 17 others
R roxdl Level 2 Verified Nov 18, 2016 51 Nov 23, 2016 #2 Good Review Thanks Reactions: Solarquest, safe1st, Der.Reisende and 2 others
H HarborFront Level 72 Verified Top Poster Content Creator Oct 9, 2016 6,142 Nov 23, 2016 #3 Thanks Its detection ratio is pretty good. The only thing that pulls this software down is its bad server connection tested previously Reactions: Solarquest, safe1st, Evjl's Rain and 5 others
Thanks Its detection ratio is pretty good. The only thing that pulls this software down is its bad server connection tested previously
frogboy In memoriam 1961-2018 Verified Top Poster Well-known Jun 9, 2013 6,720 Nov 23, 2016 #4 As @HarborFront said the server problem has been a real drama lately, always getting can't connect to server message here. Thanks @safe1st for the test as always a good video. Reactions: Solarquest, Evjl's Rain, safe1st and 4 others
As @HarborFront said the server problem has been a real drama lately, always getting can't connect to server message here. Thanks @safe1st for the test as always a good video.
XxX Legolas XxX Level 3 Verified Well-known Sep 20, 2016 116 Nov 23, 2016 #5 Great video. I don't agree with you Security First. SecureAplus definitely effective even offline just bare on configuring whitelisting technology. Offline Clam av is not needed. Reactions: safe1st, Der.Reisende, Deleted member 2913 and 1 other person
Great video. I don't agree with you Security First. SecureAplus definitely effective even offline just bare on configuring whitelisting technology. Offline Clam av is not needed.
ttto Level 9 Verified Well-known Sep 22, 2016 412 Nov 23, 2016 #6 Very effective though, and nice UI!. Thank you for the video @safe1st fantastic as always. Reactions: Deleted member 2913, safe1st, frogboy and 2 others
safe1st Level 17 Thread author Verified Top Poster Well-known Jan 29, 2016 812 Nov 23, 2016 #7 XxX Legolas XxX said: Great video. I don't agree with you Security First. SecureAplus definitely effective even offline just bare on configuring whitelisting technology. Offline Clam av is not needed. Click to expand... well, its ok and thanks everyone. have a great day! Reactions: Solarquest, XxX Legolas XxX, Der.Reisende and 3 others
XxX Legolas XxX said: Great video. I don't agree with you Security First. SecureAplus definitely effective even offline just bare on configuring whitelisting technology. Offline Clam av is not needed. Click to expand... well, its ok and thanks everyone. have a great day!
jamescv7 Level 85 Verified Honorary Member Mar 15, 2011 13,070 Nov 24, 2016 #8 We can see that even though SecureAplus needs to dropdown Virustotal reference still the relying technology goes on Whitelisting approach plus using Jotti is fine for better optimization. Since you need important engines to rely on to avoid FP's. Reactions: Solarquest, safe1st, Der.Reisende and 1 other person
We can see that even though SecureAplus needs to dropdown Virustotal reference still the relying technology goes on Whitelisting approach plus using Jotti is fine for better optimization. Since you need important engines to rely on to avoid FP's.