Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Security Product Testing?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ncage" data-source="post: 752346" data-attributes="member: 62363"><p>You can really say that about a lot of things: Guns, knives, lawn mowers, cars , motorcycles, circular saws, ect... </p><p></p><p>All you can do is throw up all kind of warnings and let people know if they go further they are doing so at their risk. I bet a lot of researching started out of curiosity. If they couldn't have access to such samples where do you think they would be now? Do you think only people who work at AV vendors should have access to such samples? I think trying to protect people from themselves is a mistake. Yes there will be those yahoos who mess their system up but then there will be those that add to the security community. </p><p></p><p>A good example is i'm a developer by trade. There are a lot of people out there programming sites with all kinds of vulnerabilities because they don't know what the heck they are doing: SQL Injection, cross site scripting attacks, don't correctly hash password in their database, ect... But do i think depriving them of products to make sites is a solution? Absolutely not. I remember shaking my head when the developers of ashley madison correctly bcyrpt passwords but in the end one of the developers thought it was to slow so he stored md5 passwords right beside it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ncage, post: 752346, member: 62363"] You can really say that about a lot of things: Guns, knives, lawn mowers, cars , motorcycles, circular saws, ect... All you can do is throw up all kind of warnings and let people know if they go further they are doing so at their risk. I bet a lot of researching started out of curiosity. If they couldn't have access to such samples where do you think they would be now? Do you think only people who work at AV vendors should have access to such samples? I think trying to protect people from themselves is a mistake. Yes there will be those yahoos who mess their system up but then there will be those that add to the security community. A good example is i'm a developer by trade. There are a lot of people out there programming sites with all kinds of vulnerabilities because they don't know what the heck they are doing: SQL Injection, cross site scripting attacks, don't correctly hash password in their database, ect... But do i think depriving them of products to make sites is a solution? Absolutely not. I remember shaking my head when the developers of ashley madison correctly bcyrpt passwords but in the end one of the developers thought it was to slow so he stored md5 passwords right beside it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top