App Review Security Software vs. Ransomware (Part 1)

[Alkajak]

Ransomware:
4 Locky ransomware files (.zepto)

Products:
Bitdefender Internet Security (w/ Ransomware Protection)
Avast Free Antivirus
Zemana AntiMalware Premium (w/ Pandora)
ESET Smart Security
Norton Security
Comodo Cloud Antivirus

 

[cruelsister]

Modal- My compliments on the production as well as the musical choice. I know how long this must have taken you to complete and look forward to anything else that you choose to share!

 

[Captain Awesome]

Good video.Thanks for share.

 

[King Alpha]

Nice! Thanks for sharing!

 

[omidomi]

Great one , Thank you

 

[Deleted member 2913]

Good test
Appreciate the hardwork & time

Thank You

 

[Noxx]

I was pleasantly surprised by the production value of your first video. Good test and I look forward to seeing more.

 

[frogboy]

Great review i really enjoyed it, Cheers.

 

[Der.Reisende]

Very nice input, thank you for the share Looking forward to more

 

[kev216]

Great video and test, especially since this is your first video. I'm looking forward to part 2.

 

[Circe]

Interesting video, thanks for posting.

 

[Logethica]

Awesome Video

 

[Viking]

Great video, looking forward to pt 2

 

[NullByte]

Looks like there is a bug in Comodo Cloud Antivirus, you scanned 4 files and in the scan interface said 2 files scanned and 100% clean (look at 7:49).

 

[Solarlynx]

Thank you! As usually your videos are awesome!

 

[_CyberGhosT_]

Awesome vid.
They did pretty good over all, nice to see Eset hangin in there.

 

[shmu26]

could someone summarize the results?

 

[Atlas147]

Great video! Something I can feedback is that I would love to see a summary of all the tests done in that video at the end of the video for easy comparison! Other than that a great job

 

[Noxx]

Looks like there is a bug in Comodo Cloud Antivirus, you scanned 4 files and in the scan interface said 2 files scanned and 100% clean (look at 7:49).

Comodo has a history of this, especially Comodo Cloud AV. As far as I'm concerned, the result is reflective of real-world scenarios. Yes, one could just redo the test, but that means nothing to some guy whose computer got infected because of flaws in CCV's code.

 

[NullByte]

I know, I was just pointing it out. It's easy for me to notice bugs or other issues so ... yeah