Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
September 2023 - The Advanced In-The-Wild Malware Test (multi-layer protection is the key to effective protection against malware)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adrian Ścibor" data-source="post: 1063254" data-attributes="member: 71496"><p>As you wrote - when it comes to 0-day, there may not be a perfect solution. However, 0-day is not a targeted APT attack. You can write a zero-day in a few lines in ChatGTP and there is no finesse here. This is why multi-layered protection is important. Look out for solutions that isolate unknown samples if you have doubts about 100% protection.</p><p></p><p>If you look at the malware comparison CSV file, maybe less than 10% of the samples used in the test are 0-day for the MKS_VIR engine, which we use for initial sample analysis. This is the signature: INFECTION: HEUR.RoundKick.W.</p><p></p><p>edit: So it's not like we're only using known threats. We use in-the-wild threats, and they are what they are. A 0-day for vendor X is not necessarily a 0-day for Y.</p><p></p><p>With 0-day file (not url) will always be detected at <strong>post_lanuch</strong> level, there is no other way. I am not writing here about specific protection, such as the threat emulation while downloading in the browser (Zone Alarm / Check Point?)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adrian Ścibor, post: 1063254, member: 71496"] As you wrote - when it comes to 0-day, there may not be a perfect solution. However, 0-day is not a targeted APT attack. You can write a zero-day in a few lines in ChatGTP and there is no finesse here. This is why multi-layered protection is important. Look out for solutions that isolate unknown samples if you have doubts about 100% protection. If you look at the malware comparison CSV file, maybe less than 10% of the samples used in the test are 0-day for the MKS_VIR engine, which we use for initial sample analysis. This is the signature: INFECTION: HEUR.RoundKick.W. edit: So it's not like we're only using known threats. We use in-the-wild threats, and they are what they are. A 0-day for vendor X is not necessarily a 0-day for Y. With 0-day file (not url) will always be detected at [B]post_lanuch[/B] level, there is no other way. I am not writing here about specific protection, such as the threat emulation while downloading in the browser (Zone Alarm / Check Point?) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top