Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Zorro" data-source="post: 971452" data-attributes="member: 80312">Thank you. But this situation with you and Hitman seems strange. Hitman uses the same Bitdefender databases as EEK, and there is no point in using KVRT, since Hitman has the same Kaspersky databases. NPE is very aggressive and therefore can give a lot of false positives. With my pc activity, such an aggressive scanner would be overkill. If I often visited the dark web, unfamiliar suspicious sites and installed suspicious programs, then using a large number of scanners would be reasonable, but with my PC activity, having a large number of scanners seems redundant, so I use one Hitman, which has databases and Kaspersky. and Bitdefender, and Sophos herself.There are quite a few rules in SH that are difficult to spell out in Hips Eset. More precisely, you can prescribe anything you want, only it will take a lot of time and effort, and there is a high probability of making a mistake somewhere that can lead to sad consequences. Easier to use SH.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Zorro, post: 971452, member: 80312"] Thank you. But this situation with you and Hitman seems strange. Hitman uses the same Bitdefender databases as EEK, and there is no point in using KVRT, since Hitman has the same Kaspersky databases. NPE is very aggressive and therefore can give a lot of false positives. With my pc activity, such an aggressive scanner would be overkill. If I often visited the dark web, unfamiliar suspicious sites and installed suspicious programs, then using a large number of scanners would be reasonable, but with my PC activity, having a large number of scanners seems redundant, so I use one Hitman, which has databases and Kaspersky. and Bitdefender, and Sophos herself. There are quite a few rules in SH that are difficult to spell out in Hips Eset. More precisely, you can prescribe anything you want, only it will take a lot of time and effort, and there is a high probability of making a mistake somewhere that can lead to sad consequences. Easier to use SH. [/QUOTE]

Verification