Currently I have kaspersky, HMPA, malwarebytes free, and voodoo shield (paid). Should I add zemana? Or is it a waste of money? P.S I was gone for a few months due to a defective gpu, but after almost 3 months I finally got my laptop back with a working gpu.
Should I get Zemana AntiMalware? Is it worth it?
- Thread starter LukeNukesEm
- Start date
This thread is being handled by a member of the staff.
- Status
- Aug 30, 2015
- 1,928
If your talking about protection with Kaspersky and HMPA it might be bad because of the many features they have can conflict, but as a free on demand scanner I have to admit it trumps MB-Anti Malware (right?) by a landslide. If it is MB Anti-Exploit you might want to be careful with exploit protection conflicting. I think Kaspersky has it too..?
- Nov 25, 2014
- 402
You already have lots of stuff, don't go for zemana, although add MBAE.
with your current setup, no no no
KIS and voodooshield are enough in theory
ZAM is a signature-based product with pandora (not proven to be effective against ransomwares)
KIS and voodooshield are enough in theory
ZAM is a signature-based product with pandora (not proven to be effective against ransomwares)
You are well-covered enough, if you mean the paid version of Zemana, in my opinion, it is not necessary but if you want, you can install ZAM free version to do some occasionally scans.
- Status
Similar threads
-
- Poll
