Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="3242enthere" data-source="post: 1091600" data-attributes="member: 114568">I don&#039;t understand what level of trust should we put on current firewall releases.WFC (windows firewall control) says it is from malwarebytes.Malwarebytes says they don&#039;t have a firewall product.WFC itself isn&#039;t open source.Here we have WFC anyway.Simplewall and Tinywall are one man open source projects.&nbsp; They are well known, but only on niche forums. (as far as I know).I could trust Comodo. Known brand, huge company etc. ..&quot;Comodo 2025 firewall only version&quot; is out and have some reviews. But it is not on the official download page.&nbsp; (it is&nbsp; only provided as a link through comodo forums anyway. So it must be a beta.)Here we have it anyway.So what should we think of?&nbsp; &nbsp; (I don&#039;t intent to look like diminishing their known work.)I&#039;d like to use one.Please advice.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="3242enthere, post: 1091600, member: 114568"] I don't understand what level of trust should we put on current firewall releases. [B]WFC[/B] (windows firewall control) says it is from malwarebytes. Malwarebytes says they don't have a firewall product. WFC itself isn't open source. Here we have WFC anyway. [B]Simplewall [/B]and [B]Tinywall [/B]are one man open source projects. They are well known, but only on niche forums. (as far as I know). I could trust Comodo. Known brand, huge company etc. .. "[B]Comodo 2025 firewall only version[/B]" is out and have some reviews. But it is [B]not[/B] on the official download page. (it is only provided as a link through comodo forums anyway. So it must be a beta.) Here we have it anyway. So what should we think of? (I don't intent to look like diminishing their known work.) I'd like to use one. Please advice. [/QUOTE]

Verification