Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Smarter App Control?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 1084988" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>@pxxb1asked about the kinds of things we are working on. An improved version of SAC that uses an extremely similar policy would be cool, especially if was flexible and user-friendly, and did not completely disable itself it things did not go his way. And if you could enable or disable it at any time, and if it had a training mode.</p><p></p><p>I have a love-hate relationship with WDAC, and working with WDAC the last few weeks has only confirmed my beliefs, and I will speak much more about that soon. In short, WDAC is viable and amazing, but only if it has a training mode or a way to quickly whitelist individual files. If you run WDAC and examine the logs, you will see TONS of unwanted blocks.</p><p></p><p>For now we added WDAC Lockdown to DefenderUI Pro to test... it was the obvious choice for a lot for reasons. It it turns out to be amazing, we will add it to CyberLock as well, which I am quite certain.</p><p></p><p>CyberLock should block any attacks, but it certainily does not hurt to have an additinonal layer just in case.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, that is what we are going to do... go through all of Microsoft Defender's features and refine the hell out of them and add them to DefenderUI, and to CyberLock if it makes sense.</p><p></p><p>There is a lot more I want to say about all of this, but I am too tired at this point, so we will talk soon <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]283036[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you guys!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 1084988, member: 62850"] @pxxb1asked about the kinds of things we are working on. An improved version of SAC that uses an extremely similar policy would be cool, especially if was flexible and user-friendly, and did not completely disable itself it things did not go his way. And if you could enable or disable it at any time, and if it had a training mode. I have a love-hate relationship with WDAC, and working with WDAC the last few weeks has only confirmed my beliefs, and I will speak much more about that soon. In short, WDAC is viable and amazing, but only if it has a training mode or a way to quickly whitelist individual files. If you run WDAC and examine the logs, you will see TONS of unwanted blocks. For now we added WDAC Lockdown to DefenderUI Pro to test... it was the obvious choice for a lot for reasons. It it turns out to be amazing, we will add it to CyberLock as well, which I am quite certain. CyberLock should block any attacks, but it certainily does not hurt to have an additinonal layer just in case. So yeah, that is what we are going to do... go through all of Microsoft Defender's features and refine the hell out of them and add them to DefenderUI, and to CyberLock if it makes sense. There is a lot more I want to say about all of this, but I am too tired at this point, so we will talk soon ;). [ATTACH type="full"]283036[/ATTACH] Thank you guys! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top