Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Kaspersky
Sophisticated hacker bypasses powerful antivirus, how?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1117899" data-attributes="member: 114717"><p>You bothered to read it and respond. Complete waste of time. My facts are straight and based upon credible, reliable, real-world attack and malware campaign statistics. Not theory and technobabble from the cybersec marketing presses.</p><p></p><p>I work for a government. I have all the threat feeds and statistics from sensors throughout the global infrastructure. Those feeds and statistics from userland show that attacks on home users are so 2001.</p><p></p><p>Of course hackers have more sophisticated tools. Those tools cost more. Therefore, hackers - except for the script kiddies - target much more lucrative systems - which ain't home user systems. The payoff for a successful enterprise hack is 100X greater than the typical home hack - unless the threat actor manages to compromise a Bitcoin Whale's system and that whale is stupid enough to not store their Bitcoin in disconnected cold storage.</p><p></p><p>Hacking is a numbers game targeting high-value, lucrative targets. Home user localhost ain't it.</p><p></p><p>Try harder. You're just feeding the paranoid pigeons trying to protect their porn fapping archives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1117899, member: 114717"] You bothered to read it and respond. Complete waste of time. My facts are straight and based upon credible, reliable, real-world attack and malware campaign statistics. Not theory and technobabble from the cybersec marketing presses. I work for a government. I have all the threat feeds and statistics from sensors throughout the global infrastructure. Those feeds and statistics from userland show that attacks on home users are so 2001. Of course hackers have more sophisticated tools. Those tools cost more. Therefore, hackers - except for the script kiddies - target much more lucrative systems - which ain't home user systems. The payoff for a successful enterprise hack is 100X greater than the typical home hack - unless the threat actor manages to compromise a Bitcoin Whale's system and that whale is stupid enough to not store their Bitcoin in disconnected cold storage. Hacking is a numbers game targeting high-value, lucrative targets. Home user localhost ain't it. Try harder. You're just feeding the paranoid pigeons trying to protect their porn fapping archives. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top