SpyShelter 10.9.5 released

[Bot]

Biggest and most anticipated change in newest version of SpyShelter Anti-Keylogger is the added compatibility for the most recent version of Windows 10, i.e. Fall Creators Update.

SpyShelter 10.9.5 also includes a bunch of overall security improvements as well as some GUI fixes, such as fixing tray notification display issues which some users have experienced.
Licensing issues on non-administrative accounts should no longer happen.

In following days, a new SpyShelter product will join the family.

Stay tuned for more updates and make sure to follow us Facebook & Twitter!

SpyShelter 10.9.5 (17/Oct/2017) Changelog:

– Added Windows 10 Fall Creators Update compatibility
– Notification Balloons updates and fixes
– Other corrections

 

[509322]

They will soon be releasing a new product - something other than SpyShelter Anti-Logger or Firewall, but aren't saying what it is.

 

[neon]

Lockdown but this new product will be better than SSFW ? what will it be ?

 

[509322]

Lockdown but this new product will be better than SSFW ? what will it be ?

I don't know what it is. I was just pointing out what they said that people missed in their blog. New product in coming days.

 

[neon]

It will be super

 

[509322]

It will be super

Could be anything. I don't think it will be an "enhanced" version of SpyShelter, but instead it will be something else. Just a guess. Could turn out to be a wrong guess.

 

[shmu26]

My guess is the new product will be ransomware protection, which is a big thing these days, and it is the area that SpyShelter seems to be weakest in.

 

[Azure]

My guess is the new product will be ransomware protection, which is a big thing these days, and it is the area that SpyShelter seems to be weakest in.

Or maybe an anti-malware. Cause they want to keep competing with Zemana.

 

[shmu26]

My guess is the new product will be ransomware protection, which is a big thing these days, and it is the area that SpyShelter seems to be weakest in.

I realized that Datpol is smart to keep their product simple. They know what they do well, and they stick to it. There are too many programs that try to do everything, and fail.

 

[HarborFront]

Or maybe an anti-malware. Cause they want to keep competing with Zemana.

But SS has a FW which Zemana lacks

 

[shmu26]

But SS has a FW which Zemana lacks

Yeah, SS and Zemana are both known for keystroke encryption, but that's about as far as the comparison goes. I don't even use the keystroke encryption in SS. It seemed to interfere with smoothly switching back and forth between keyboard input methods, i.e., the Windows language tab. I switch all the time between English keyboard and Hebrew keyboard.

 

[aragornnnn]

"Spyshelter Silent Anti-Keylogger" is their "new" product? which costs 12$ a year

 

[shmu26]

"Spyshelter Silent Anti-Keylogger" is their "new" product? which costs 12$ a year

Yeah, skip it.

 

[ichito]

Sorry guys but I don't understand your complains...why SS have to include special anti-ransome protection? It's specialised tool whit specific features what made it the best solution in anti-logger cathegory and...BTW...it has some anti-ransom layer - file/folder protection (not saing about HIPS module, restricted apps or restricted folders what was already mentioned on forum). Please...don't be so fussy

 

[shmu26]

Sorry guys but I don't understand your complains...why SS have to include special anti-ransome protection? It's specialised tool whit specific features what made it the best solution in anti-logger cathegory and...BTW...it has some anti-ransom layer - file/folder protection (not saing about HIPS module, restricted apps or restricted folders what was already mentioned on forum). Please...don't be so fussy

I agree with you. That's what I was trying to say, when I said that Datpol is smart to keep their product simple and effective. What they do, they do well.

 

[HarborFront]

I might be wrong. The current version has

1) No protection from HTTP/HTTPS keyloggers (i.e. against web-based keyloggers) and browser add-on/extension keyloggers
2) No protection against mouse click
3) No anti-keystroke profiling feature
4) No script-based protection

 

[ichito]

I might be wrong. The current version has

1) No protection from HTTP/HTTPS keyloggers (i.e. against web-based keyloggers) and browser add-on/extension keyloggers
2) No protection against mouse click
3) No anti-keystroke profiling feature
4) No script-based protection

OK...interresting..but how did you test it...especialy number 3?

 

[509322]

I might be wrong. The current version has

1) No protection from HTTP/HTTPS keyloggers (i.e. against web-based keyloggers) and browser add-on/extension keyloggers
2) No protection against mouse click
3) No anti-keystroke profiling feature
4) No script-based protection

And neither do other security softs - that is all web-based\website-based except for the malicious browser add-on\extension which are detected by signature which can be lookup via VT which is the same as other vendors which detect by signature

SpyShelter is more capable in the right hands than any internet security suite can ever hope to be.

 

[shmu26]

except for the malicious browser add-on\extension which are detected by signature which can be lookup via VT which is the same as other vendors which detect by signature

So when you add an extension to your browser, your AV checks it by signature?

 

[509322]

So when you add an extension to your browser, your AV checks it by signature?

Research it. Some can. There are different ways to install add-ons\extensions.