Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
SRP - A practical default allow?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="notabot" data-source="post: 795549" data-attributes="member: 75970"><p>Default deny has the issue that it may become impractical.</p><p></p><p>I was thinking of a default allow with the below applications tightly controlled:</p><p></p><p>1) browsers</p><p>2) pdf reader</p><p>3) Office/anything that opens a document</p><p>4) email client</p><p>5) chat clients, Skype , messengers</p><p></p><p>So basically anything that connects to the internet and opens & parses input.</p><p></p><p>This way someone can develop in Visual Studio , node etc without hinderance and have a tightly controlled set of applications that can be exploited from the web/PDFs/spreadsheets etc.</p><p></p><p>Does the above miss any significant attack vector ? I’d find this way more practical than a default deny setup</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="notabot, post: 795549, member: 75970"] Default deny has the issue that it may become impractical. I was thinking of a default allow with the below applications tightly controlled: 1) browsers 2) pdf reader 3) Office/anything that opens a document 4) email client 5) chat clients, Skype , messengers So basically anything that connects to the internet and opens & parses input. This way someone can develop in Visual Studio , node etc without hinderance and have a tightly controlled set of applications that can be exploited from the web/PDFs/spreadsheets etc. Does the above miss any significant attack vector ? I’d find this way more practical than a default deny setup [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
