Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
SRP - A practical default allow?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="notabot" data-source="post: 795653" data-attributes="member: 75970"><p>Thanks @ Andy, I plan to block sponsors via WDAC when I get a free evening do you have a list of sponsors ?</p><p></p><p>I can’t agree regarding GPO and Office, it eg lets you block downloaded active content ( or active content altogether). If you refer to exploitation of office without active content by eg buffer overflows , these are complex, big apps and probably to have undiscovered exploits. But this is not a commodity attack.</p><p> To cover these Exploit Guard ( to reduce the probability of exploit succeeding ) + WDAC for sponsors ( to reduce chances of privilege escalation ) + SRP ( to reduce what an exploited app can do from user space ). This lockdown is probably as good as it gets. We also have to consider that a document that’s meant to do a 0day without active content and also bypasses the other 3 mitigation layers, while entirely possible, is probably something that us home users don’t need to be worried about and I don’t believe there’s anything that can block an attack that’s so elaborate</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="notabot, post: 795653, member: 75970"] Thanks @ Andy, I plan to block sponsors via WDAC when I get a free evening do you have a list of sponsors ? I can’t agree regarding GPO and Office, it eg lets you block downloaded active content ( or active content altogether). If you refer to exploitation of office without active content by eg buffer overflows , these are complex, big apps and probably to have undiscovered exploits. But this is not a commodity attack. To cover these Exploit Guard ( to reduce the probability of exploit succeeding ) + WDAC for sponsors ( to reduce chances of privilege escalation ) + SRP ( to reduce what an exploited app can do from user space ). This lockdown is probably as good as it gets. We also have to consider that a document that’s meant to do a 0day without active content and also bypasses the other 3 mitigation layers, while entirely possible, is probably something that us home users don’t need to be worried about and I don’t believe there’s anything that can block an attack that’s so elaborate [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top