Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Stupid default settings of some Antiviruses
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 804700" data-attributes="member: 78686"><p>Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts. Now I understand why many AV's nowadays opting not to scan every files. </p><p></p><p>Actually, in my experience Defender is pretty fast. It only feels a bit slower when enter into a folder with lot of executables but that's very rare. Otherwise it feels very fast. Currently I'm using Kaspersky Free, weirdly it seems to slow down copying speed a bit but otherwise it's very fast too. </p><p></p><p>Actually, a year or two ago Eset did the same for me too but latest update didn't do so. Maybe they changed something now? I agree Eset is very fast indeed.</p><p></p><p>True. I'm one of those people who finds Defender to be very light nowadays. A year ago it was slower but now it feels very fast.</p><p></p><p>I agree. Performance varies from PC to PC. I check their report just to get an idea of the performance. </p><p></p><p>Right. The difference is probably not much. Merely a second or two. It depends on the user whether they feels and accept this slowdown or not.</p><p></p><p>This makes sense. In my case it's more down to peace of mind I guess. I usually used Kaspersky, AVG, Avira, Norton, Windows Defender for a longer period for the last 10-12 years. Among this only AVG changed the behavior and other are still continuing the traditional way. So, I'm more used to such config hence feel a bit insecure with the current standard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 804700, member: 78686"] Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts. Now I understand why many AV's nowadays opting not to scan every files. Actually, in my experience Defender is pretty fast. It only feels a bit slower when enter into a folder with lot of executables but that's very rare. Otherwise it feels very fast. Currently I'm using Kaspersky Free, weirdly it seems to slow down copying speed a bit but otherwise it's very fast too. Actually, a year or two ago Eset did the same for me too but latest update didn't do so. Maybe they changed something now? I agree Eset is very fast indeed. True. I'm one of those people who finds Defender to be very light nowadays. A year ago it was slower but now it feels very fast. I agree. Performance varies from PC to PC. I check their report just to get an idea of the performance. Right. The difference is probably not much. Merely a second or two. It depends on the user whether they feels and accept this slowdown or not. This makes sense. In my case it's more down to peace of mind I guess. I usually used Kaspersky, AVG, Avira, Norton, Windows Defender for a longer period for the last 10-12 years. Among this only AVG changed the behavior and other are still continuing the traditional way. So, I'm more used to such config hence feel a bit insecure with the current standard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top