Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Community
Community Feedback
Suggestions for Malware Vault testers
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheMalwareMaster" data-source="post: 660641" data-attributes="member: 47679"><p>Indeed.</p><p>I can't understand why people here don't agree with my points... </p><p>1) If all samples are detected statically (manual scan with realtime protection disabled) there is no chance that the system got infected, because the user hasn't even launched the malware</p><p>2) How can a sample whose execution has been negated be able to infect a system? (considering VodooShield, COMODO at default-deny, avast hardened mode, some cloud products with avira. This doesn't happen always but there may be cases in which the entire set of samples is detected by signatures+cloud (considering avira). Knowing how avira works, the cloud doesn't let the sample run at all, and immediatly quarantines it</p><p></p><p>These are the cases, in which, in my opinion, second opinion scanners are not needed. It was just to make the tester not waste time</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheMalwareMaster, post: 660641, member: 47679"] Indeed. I can't understand why people here don't agree with my points... 1) If all samples are detected statically (manual scan with realtime protection disabled) there is no chance that the system got infected, because the user hasn't even launched the malware 2) How can a sample whose execution has been negated be able to infect a system? (considering VodooShield, COMODO at default-deny, avast hardened mode, some cloud products with avira. This doesn't happen always but there may be cases in which the entire set of samples is detected by signatures+cloud (considering avira). Knowing how avira works, the cloud doesn't let the sample run at all, and immediatly quarantines it These are the cases, in which, in my opinion, second opinion scanners are not needed. It was just to make the tester not waste time [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
