Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Suites with Proven Behavior Blockers that you Trust and Recommend
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted Member 308817310" data-source="post: 823364" data-attributes="member: 80647"><p>There is no such thing as a "proven" behavior blocker. Any behavior blocker is destined to eventually fail if you put it up against enough samples. It's a hit and miss every single time you run a sample. The only thing you're going to find when asking for a "proven" behavior blocker is a "he said" and "she said" game. One word against someone else's. What is the point of that and how is it productive? It's not.</p><p></p><p>It's all fun and games when you're running samples the AV KNOWS is unknown/new or untrusted on its cloud network but what happens when an exploit is used and a safe, genuine and common program is abused for malicious purposes?</p><p></p><p>I'm just saying, it doesn't take a genius to get a high detection ratio with unknown malware when the attack chain in the test is limited to just running samples which are relatively new, untrusted on the cloud network. There's more effective testing methodologies out there to really learn the strengths and weaknesses of a particular product, but you've got to be willing to learn and spend the time to do the necessary work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted Member 308817310, post: 823364, member: 80647"] There is no such thing as a "proven" behavior blocker. Any behavior blocker is destined to eventually fail if you put it up against enough samples. It's a hit and miss every single time you run a sample. The only thing you're going to find when asking for a "proven" behavior blocker is a "he said" and "she said" game. One word against someone else's. What is the point of that and how is it productive? It's not. It's all fun and games when you're running samples the AV KNOWS is unknown/new or untrusted on its cloud network but what happens when an exploit is used and a safe, genuine and common program is abused for malicious purposes? I'm just saying, it doesn't take a genius to get a high detection ratio with unknown malware when the attack chain in the test is limited to just running samples which are relatively new, untrusted on the cloud network. There's more effective testing methodologies out there to really learn the strengths and weaknesses of a particular product, but you've got to be willing to learn and spend the time to do the necessary work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top