Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Suites with Proven Behavior Blockers that you Trust and Recommend
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 823465" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>The AV technologies evolve and the terminology evolves too. Some AV vendors like Emsisoft still use the term Behavior Blocker, probably to maintain product continuity, but this term seems less appropriate when machine learning technologies are involved.</p><p>Even a Zero-day term is not clear nowadays. A few years ago it was related exclusively to exploits. So, the Zero-day protection had a meaning to protect against Zero-day exploits.</p><p>To avoid confusion it is better to say about protection/prevention against UDs or FUDs.</p><p>UD - undetectable by signatures, but uses known techniques so can be detected/removed by one or more AVs.</p><p>FUD - undetectable by AVs for some time.</p><p></p><p>The protection against FUDs may look strange, but it is possible in the era of machine learning based on the complex telemetry from all computers in the AV network (Big Data Analytics). The AVs will miss the FUD malware, so it can infect some computers. But after some minutes/hours the telemetry from infected computers can alarm the AV cloud. The infection chain is now analyzed by the special methods including human expert analysis and most FUDs will be detected in this way and the infection cannot spread out.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p><p></p><p>So, you probably are interested in AVs with strong UD protection like CIS, KIS, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 823465, member: 32260"] The AV technologies evolve and the terminology evolves too. Some AV vendors like Emsisoft still use the term Behavior Blocker, probably to maintain product continuity, but this term seems less appropriate when machine learning technologies are involved. Even a Zero-day term is not clear nowadays. A few years ago it was related exclusively to exploits. So, the Zero-day protection had a meaning to protect against Zero-day exploits. To avoid confusion it is better to say about protection/prevention against UDs or FUDs. UD - undetectable by signatures, but uses known techniques so can be detected/removed by one or more AVs. FUD - undetectable by AVs for some time. The protection against FUDs may look strange, but it is possible in the era of machine learning based on the complex telemetry from all computers in the AV network (Big Data Analytics). The AVs will miss the FUD malware, so it can infect some computers. But after some minutes/hours the telemetry from infected computers can alarm the AV cloud. The infection chain is now analyzed by the special methods including human expert analysis and most FUDs will be detected in this way and the infection cannot spread out.(y) So, you probably are interested in AVs with strong UD protection like CIS, KIS, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top