Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1026481" data-attributes="member: 57714">You can make it equal or better protection then vodooshield if you configure&nbsp; polices But&nbsp; what vodooshield in&nbsp; my opinion does better is pricing ease of use and support (Broadcom support sucks )Oh and since it’s not bloated like Symantec so products is lighter and more reliable then Symantec thankfully voodoo shield doesn’t waste resources scanning so much useless ##### or having huge databases in ram )Overall I think both are enough but definitely Symantec is a whole product with everything included in itnote consumers can only access the unmanaged client and certain features as stated in cmoss.ru sitealthough with regedit / importing polices they can extend / unlock certain client sided features&nbsp; that can’t be configured from the GUIwhile staying unmanagedin my opinion it’s a hassle working with Symantec and since we have comoodo firewall / hard configurator / vodooshield Wich are all less hassle&nbsp; while having similar protection&nbsp; There is barely any use for Symantec and if someone wants a non default deny automatic protection without&nbsp; playing with settings&nbsp; with little to none false positives I think kaspersky cloud is better&nbsp; in almost every way over Unconfigured Symantec endpoint protection from security to reliability maybe better About performance&nbsp; Symantec was lighter on my old thinkpad except memory leaks / spikes&nbsp; so it’s not reliable although actual low end PCs shouldn’t even run an av component when every little ounce of resources&nbsp; matters and probably they are better off migrating to some *nix system like Linux / bsd if software support isn’t an issue</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1026481, member: 57714"] You can make it equal or better protection then vodooshield if you configure polices But what vodooshield in my opinion does better is pricing ease of use and support (Broadcom support sucks ) Oh and since it’s not bloated like Symantec so products is lighter and more reliable then Symantec thankfully voodoo shield doesn’t waste resources scanning so much useless ##### or having huge databases in ram ) Overall I think both are enough but definitely Symantec is a whole product with everything included in it note consumers can only access the unmanaged client and certain features as stated in cmoss.ru site although with regedit / importing polices they can extend / unlock certain client sided features that can’t be configured from the GUI while staying unmanaged in my opinion it’s a hassle working with Symantec and since we have comoodo firewall / hard configurator / vodooshield Wich are all less hassle while having similar protection There is barely any use for Symantec and if someone wants a non default deny automatic protection without playing with settings with little to none false positives I think kaspersky cloud is better in almost every way over Unconfigured Symantec endpoint protection from security to reliability maybe better About performance Symantec was lighter on my old thinkpad except memory leaks / spikes so it’s not reliable although actual low end PCs shouldn’t even run an av component when every little ounce of resources matters and probably they are better off migrating to some *nix system like Linux / bsd if software support isn’t an issue [/QUOTE]

Verification