Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Symantec Endpoint Unmanaged without time limit
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 905280" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>The only thing I meant by git hub is that let's say you download/compile unknown executable to Symantec it might cause a false positive (annoyance) but comodo in a default deny Config like cruel sister settings would act even more aggressive then Symantec stock settings (both can be configerd to act as SRP )</p><p>But if you're used to such a hardened setup false positives wouldn't be an issue for you XD</p><p></p><p>It's only in issue for people who download many shady or unknown code from shady piracy or modding to download new unpopular/ unknown code to Symantec</p><p></p><p>Personality for my gaming rig I use Kaspersky as it rarely caused me false positives using game mods and SEP with only network component managed by SPEM </p><p>A good alternative for Kaspersky would be eset wich have even lower false positives but lower default protection as well</p><p></p><p></p><p>And other devices I run Symantec excluding a low end laptop that is currently running comodo firewall cruel sister settings (Symantec was too heavy )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 905280, member: 57714"] The only thing I meant by git hub is that let's say you download/compile unknown executable to Symantec it might cause a false positive (annoyance) but comodo in a default deny Config like cruel sister settings would act even more aggressive then Symantec stock settings (both can be configerd to act as SRP ) But if you're used to such a hardened setup false positives wouldn't be an issue for you XD It's only in issue for people who download many shady or unknown code from shady piracy or modding to download new unpopular/ unknown code to Symantec Personality for my gaming rig I use Kaspersky as it rarely caused me false positives using game mods and SEP with only network component managed by SPEM A good alternative for Kaspersky would be eset wich have even lower false positives but lower default protection as well And other devices I run Symantec excluding a low end laptop that is currently running comodo firewall cruel sister settings (Symantec was too heavy ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top