Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Testing security software in a rush with some samples - what do you think?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1036753" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>Because the installer (guessing cracked) is a self-extracting archive (compound file) scanning of archives will have to be enabled for real time protection to extract the file and scan it.</p><p></p><p>That goes for all antiviruses. I personally always enable archive scanning, but it creates a higher performance overhead. Threats in archives and installers are considered latent with the assumption that you or the archive will extract files and they will be scanned one by one. But frequently, additional threats can be embedded, such as injectors. The default setup where archives are not scanned is not great.</p><p></p><p>About Avast Free, many people are surprised, as they are not aware of the technology behind Avast. Avast is frequently the first and only one to somehow (be it with web shield, antivirus or something else) block a threat. The assumption that Avast is ineffective is wrong and is bias spread on various forums, including this one, by people who have 0 knowledge of threats, the antivirus industry and Avast as a company.</p><p></p><p>Today I tested few threats which were only picked up by Avast and the CheckPoint emulation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1036753, member: 99014"] Because the installer (guessing cracked) is a self-extracting archive (compound file) scanning of archives will have to be enabled for real time protection to extract the file and scan it. That goes for all antiviruses. I personally always enable archive scanning, but it creates a higher performance overhead. Threats in archives and installers are considered latent with the assumption that you or the archive will extract files and they will be scanned one by one. But frequently, additional threats can be embedded, such as injectors. The default setup where archives are not scanned is not great. About Avast Free, many people are surprised, as they are not aware of the technology behind Avast. Avast is frequently the first and only one to somehow (be it with web shield, antivirus or something else) block a threat. The assumption that Avast is ineffective is wrong and is bias spread on various forums, including this one, by people who have 0 knowledge of threats, the antivirus industry and Avast as a company. Today I tested few threats which were only picked up by Avast and the CheckPoint emulation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top