Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Testing security software in a rush with some samples - what do you think?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1036761" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>By default many of them don't scan in archives (not to say all as there are over 200 antivirus, haven't tried all). Many have additional settings (Bitdefender, Eset, Norton, Trend Micro and others) that activates scanning in archives. <a href="https://www.bitdefender.com/consumer/support/answer/13450/" target="_blank">Bitdefender warns that this reduces performance and is not needed as archives will be scanned on as-used basis</a>. Some products have no setting to enable archive scanning (McAfee, ZoneAlarm, potentially F-Secure). These products rely on the assumption that once in use, all archive content will be scanned. Behavioural blocking and other components should stop the attacks. </p><p></p><p></p><p>They are, the 2 products use the same codebase.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No, there are many people that go around telling stories how ineffective it is. I've seen these stories here as well. Told by people who can't establish whether a pdf document contains malware or not. They know nothing about malware but they believe they can measure the effectiveness of an antivirus product.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1036761, member: 99014"] By default many of them don't scan in archives (not to say all as there are over 200 antivirus, haven't tried all). Many have additional settings (Bitdefender, Eset, Norton, Trend Micro and others) that activates scanning in archives. [URL='https://www.bitdefender.com/consumer/support/answer/13450/']Bitdefender warns that this reduces performance and is not needed as archives will be scanned on as-used basis[/URL]. Some products have no setting to enable archive scanning (McAfee, ZoneAlarm, potentially F-Secure). These products rely on the assumption that once in use, all archive content will be scanned. Behavioural blocking and other components should stop the attacks. They are, the 2 products use the same codebase. No, there are many people that go around telling stories how ineffective it is. I've seen these stories here as well. Told by people who can't establish whether a pdf document contains malware or not. They know nothing about malware but they believe they can measure the effectiveness of an antivirus product. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top