Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hardware
Hardware Discussions
Testing Windows 10 Performance Before and After the Meltdown Flaw Emergency Patch
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 58943" data-source="post: 707146"><p>You can bet this was a purposeful hole. Some experts are saying if it wasn't purposeful then the engineers involved are either totally blind, ignorant or incredibly incompetent but probably would have to be all three. Almost nobody believes these guys are, so the only logical conclusion is - this is purposeful. I wouldn't doubt for a minute if it wasn't purposeful and probably one of the most important techniques for intelligence gathering available.</p><p></p><p>If you 'carefully' look around, observe, and read documents you'll see hints that they knew of this. For example when Greenwald stored Snowden documents on encrypted AWS servers, then he was advised by consultants to move his stuff off AWS the NSA blew a gasket about that move saying they needed to 'disrupt advice such as this in the future'.. I'm guessing here, but i suspect they wanted it on AWS so they could Meltdown capture the VM contents Greenwald was using on his VM. I've seen other things and have read between the lines to suggest it. Jake Williams (Security Researcher) says the probability this was a purposeful backdoor is near 100%.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, as we roll out Meltdown patches, we're seeing performance hits from 3% up to 50%. It depends on a lot of factors, but I ran into a machine hitting 50% performance impact yesterday and we're going to recommend machine replacement..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 58943, post: 707146"] You can bet this was a purposeful hole. Some experts are saying if it wasn't purposeful then the engineers involved are either totally blind, ignorant or incredibly incompetent but probably would have to be all three. Almost nobody believes these guys are, so the only logical conclusion is - this is purposeful. I wouldn't doubt for a minute if it wasn't purposeful and probably one of the most important techniques for intelligence gathering available. If you 'carefully' look around, observe, and read documents you'll see hints that they knew of this. For example when Greenwald stored Snowden documents on encrypted AWS servers, then he was advised by consultants to move his stuff off AWS the NSA blew a gasket about that move saying they needed to 'disrupt advice such as this in the future'.. I'm guessing here, but i suspect they wanted it on AWS so they could Meltdown capture the VM contents Greenwald was using on his VM. I've seen other things and have read between the lines to suggest it. Jake Williams (Security Researcher) says the probability this was a purposeful backdoor is near 100%. Anyway, as we roll out Meltdown patches, we're seeing performance hits from 3% up to 50%. It depends on a lot of factors, but I ran into a machine hitting 50% performance impact yesterday and we're going to recommend machine replacement.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top