Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
The best Home AV protection 2019-2020
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 928014" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>This part of the Trend Micro explanation is questionable. From the AV-Comparatives report <span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>September</strong></span> 2020:</p><p></p><p>"<strong>Testcases</strong></p><p>The test set used for this test consisted of 10,102 malware samples, assembled after consulting telemetry data with the aim of including<span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong> recent, prevalent samples</strong></span><strong> that are endangering users in the field</strong>. Malware variants were clustered, in order to build a more representative test-set (i.e. to avoid over-representation of the very same malware in the set). The sample collection process was stopped end of <span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>August</strong></span> 2020."</p><p></p><p>Such samples can survive on flash drives, network drives, inside repositories downloaded via torrents, ISO images, etc. I would rather believe AV-Comparatives that these samples can be still dangerous for some people. The Trend Micro answer is not convincing, especially when other vendors can detect such samples far better.</p><p><a href="https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-september-2020/" target="_blank">Malware Protection Test September 2020 - AV-Comparatives (av-comparatives.org)</a></p><p></p><p>Generally, I agree that for many people it is better to get top Real-World protection and not-especially-good Malware Protection (but almost 0 false positives) than conversely.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 928014, member: 32260"] This part of the Trend Micro explanation is questionable. From the AV-Comparatives report [COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]September[/B][/COLOR] 2020: "[B]Testcases[/B] The test set used for this test consisted of 10,102 malware samples, assembled after consulting telemetry data with the aim of including[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B] recent, prevalent samples[/B][/COLOR][B] that are endangering users in the field[/B]. Malware variants were clustered, in order to build a more representative test-set (i.e. to avoid over-representation of the very same malware in the set). The sample collection process was stopped end of [COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]August[/B][/COLOR] 2020." Such samples can survive on flash drives, network drives, inside repositories downloaded via torrents, ISO images, etc. I would rather believe AV-Comparatives that these samples can be still dangerous for some people. The Trend Micro answer is not convincing, especially when other vendors can detect such samples far better. [URL='https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-september-2020/']Malware Protection Test September 2020 - AV-Comparatives (av-comparatives.org)[/URL] Generally, I agree that for many people it is better to get top Real-World protection and not-especially-good Malware Protection (but almost 0 false positives) than conversely.:) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top