Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andrezj" data-source="post: 1021982" data-attributes="member: 97580">windows was not developed for home users, it was created for enterprises where every workstation is domain-joined and there is an administrator in controlwindows home is just an oem agreement and an additional source of income for microsoft, however when it comes to security microsoft is mainly focused on paid enterprise clientsnot only that, least functionality is required under many regulations and needed to obtain cybersecurity insurancehome users that embrace the protection model have no problem with itenterprises have no problem with it&quot;users that want to use stuff&quot; are the ones who have a problem with ityou can have your freedom to do whatever you want, and convenience\usability, but that will ALWAYS come at the expense of greatly reduced securityit is completely unrealistic to expect that anybody - microsoft, security vendors - can keep anybody safe under such circumstances</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andrezj, post: 1021982, member: 97580"] windows was not developed for home users, it was created for enterprises where every workstation is domain-joined and there is an administrator in control windows home is just an oem agreement and an additional source of income for microsoft, however when it comes to security microsoft is mainly focused on paid enterprise clients not only that, least functionality is required under many regulations and needed to obtain cybersecurity insurance home users that embrace the protection model have no problem with it enterprises have no problem with it "users that want to use stuff" are the ones who have a problem with it you can have your freedom to do whatever you want, and convenience\usability, but that will ALWAYS come at the expense of greatly reduced security it is completely unrealistic to expect that anybody - microsoft, security vendors - can keep anybody safe under such circumstances [/QUOTE]

Verification