Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
The best Home AV protection 2021-2022
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1023158" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p><strong>Does Population Size matter?</strong></p><p></p><p>When calculating the exact value of the sample size "s" we need to know the Population Size "N". But, it is worth knowing that in many cases the sample size does not significantly differ from its value "s0" calculated for unlimited Population Size. The same is true for the Margin of Error "e" which is usually almost the same as its value "e0" calculated for unlimited Population Size.</p><p>We have:</p><p>If s/N = d << 1 Then:</p><p>e ~ e0*(1 - d/2)</p><p>s ~ s0*(1-d)</p><p></p><p>A typical situation in any R-W test is that s >= 100 and d < 1/100.</p><p>To show this, I took the data from the SonicWall report:</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]272653[/ATTACH]</p><p>If we use the data from the year 2021, then we can calculate over 1200 samples per 1 day. In a typical R-W test, approximately 6 samples per 1 day are used. In such a case we have:</p><p>d ~ 6/1200 = 0.005</p><p>We can use the unlimited Population Size (N ----> infinity) and the difference in results will be:</p><p>Sample Size (with a relative error of 0.5%)</p><p>Margin of Error (with a relative error of 0.25%)</p><p></p><p>In reality, these errors should be even smaller, because in tests we can have also some samples that are not Never-Before-Seen.</p><p></p><p>Post updated/corrected.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1023158, member: 32260"] [B]Does Population Size matter?[/B] When calculating the exact value of the sample size "s" we need to know the Population Size "N". But, it is worth knowing that in many cases the sample size does not significantly differ from its value "s0" calculated for unlimited Population Size. The same is true for the Margin of Error "e" which is usually almost the same as its value "e0" calculated for unlimited Population Size. We have: If s/N = d << 1 Then: e ~ e0*(1 - d/2) s ~ s0*(1-d) A typical situation in any R-W test is that s >= 100 and d < 1/100. To show this, I took the data from the SonicWall report: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1675540422097.png"]272653[/ATTACH] If we use the data from the year 2021, then we can calculate over 1200 samples per 1 day. In a typical R-W test, approximately 6 samples per 1 day are used. In such a case we have: d ~ 6/1200 = 0.005 We can use the unlimited Population Size (N ----> infinity) and the difference in results will be: Sample Size (with a relative error of 0.5%) Margin of Error (with a relative error of 0.25%) In reality, these errors should be even smaller, because in tests we can have also some samples that are not Never-Before-Seen. Post updated/corrected. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top