Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
The best Windows antivirus software for home users: Februari 2025
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1120840" data-attributes="member: 114717"><p>The tests are for marketing. They are not designed nor intended to make, what you would consider, meaningful distinctions in security capabilities and protections between the test participant software/products.</p><p></p><p>Such a test would be so expensive that nobody in the AV industry would participate. Even if they did hand over the cash, every vendor that did poorly would never participate again. Both of these facts work against AV test labs.</p><p></p><p>Emsisoft stopped the test lab participation because, on average, the cost for a single test is approximately 65,000 Euros nowadays. F-Secure and G Data stopped (participating in AV Comparatives, for a while) because they were always placing poorly, and their position was that the tests were not truly reflective of the software's protection abilities.</p><p></p><p>F-Secure, at that time, was correct. G Data was not because its software has some serious problems, which I'm going to bet have not been fixed to this very day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1120840, member: 114717"] The tests are for marketing. They are not designed nor intended to make, what you would consider, meaningful distinctions in security capabilities and protections between the test participant software/products. Such a test would be so expensive that nobody in the AV industry would participate. Even if they did hand over the cash, every vendor that did poorly would never participate again. Both of these facts work against AV test labs. Emsisoft stopped the test lab participation because, on average, the cost for a single test is approximately 65,000 Euros nowadays. F-Secure and G Data stopped (participating in AV Comparatives, for a while) because they were always placing poorly, and their position was that the tests were not truly reflective of the software's protection abilities. F-Secure, at that time, was correct. G Data was not because its software has some serious problems, which I'm going to bet have not been fixed to this very day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top