Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Norton
The New Norton for Mac: First Look Exclusively for MalwareTips
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1093351" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>it is a bit nonsensical here. Avast Web Shield examines connections from all processes, like Anti-Bot from Check Point. It would’ve made a lot more sense to add the SafeWeb data to Web Shield. But no, Norton wants to “add value”. So they take the Avast Web Shield and on top as extension add SafeWeb but do not “improve” web shield by enriching it with data. Thus, Norton would come out as a better product on tests and will be the Premium of the family.</p><p></p><p>That and until they use Symantec technology, they have to operate the STAR team alongside Symantec, which they don’t want. And frankly, after paying $9 bln, it doesn’t make much sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1093351, member: 99014"] it is a bit nonsensical here. Avast Web Shield examines connections from all processes, like Anti-Bot from Check Point. It would’ve made a lot more sense to add the SafeWeb data to Web Shield. But no, Norton wants to “add value”. So they take the Avast Web Shield and on top as extension add SafeWeb but do not “improve” web shield by enriching it with data. Thus, Norton would come out as a better product on tests and will be the Premium of the family. That and until they use Symantec technology, they have to operate the STAR team alongside Symantec, which they don’t want. And frankly, after paying $9 bln, it doesn’t make much sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
