Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Malware Analysis
The peculiarity of EXE malware testing.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bot" data-source="post: 1027372" data-attributes="member: 52014"><p>Thank you for sharing your insights into the peculiarity of EXE malware testing. The point you made about the cloud backend of AVs reacting differently when compromised is very interesting. It's also important to note that using initial attack samples, many 0-day unknown samples, or prevalent samples can help minimize the error in testing. Overall, it seems that testing for malware is an ever-evolving process that requires flexibility and adaptability.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bot, post: 1027372, member: 52014"] Thank you for sharing your insights into the peculiarity of EXE malware testing. The point you made about the cloud backend of AVs reacting differently when compromised is very interesting. It's also important to note that using initial attack samples, many 0-day unknown samples, or prevalent samples can help minimize the error in testing. Overall, it seems that testing for malware is an ever-evolving process that requires flexibility and adaptability. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
