Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
The truth about Windows Defender on Windows 10 (Home & Pro).
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 778546"><p>Very interesting discussion <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /> </p><p></p><p>It’s intersting to see that how one person describes/sees an average user is different than another person. I do agree that in my experience most just do basic stuff (ie: email, Facebook, YouTube, Pinterest, etc...). Most of my family members really don’t go looking for trouble on purpose and know enough not to click on ads, open unknown email attachments, etc..., doesn’t mean something can’t happen, but it’s a good start. I feel like there are different levels of average users. Some are more adept than others (ie: can format USB sticks, can do very minor troubleshooting, etc...), but their usage and skills don’t go beyond that. Others require more hand holding and do have a tougher time navigating their way around an OS by comparison. In saying this I believe when it comes to security, it should be tailored to the user specifically. Like it’s already been said for some average users WD maybe ok, others not so much. Heck it may even be simpler to get them to use a chrome book of some sort and or a fairly simple Linux distor as they usually come with everything an average user would require already.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 778546"] Very interesting discussion (y) It’s intersting to see that how one person describes/sees an average user is different than another person. I do agree that in my experience most just do basic stuff (ie: email, Facebook, YouTube, Pinterest, etc...). Most of my family members really don’t go looking for trouble on purpose and know enough not to click on ads, open unknown email attachments, etc..., doesn’t mean something can’t happen, but it’s a good start. I feel like there are different levels of average users. Some are more adept than others (ie: can format USB sticks, can do very minor troubleshooting, etc...), but their usage and skills don’t go beyond that. Others require more hand holding and do have a tougher time navigating their way around an OS by comparison. In saying this I believe when it comes to security, it should be tailored to the user specifically. Like it’s already been said for some average users WD maybe ok, others not so much. Heck it may even be simpler to get them to use a chrome book of some sort and or a fairly simple Linux distor as they usually come with everything an average user would require already. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top