Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mazskolnieces" data-source="post: 909195" data-attributes="member: 88422">Systemd-shim is used.<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Fedora KDE 847 MB</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Manjaro KDE 714 MB</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Kubuntu KDE 683 MB</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">OpenSUSE KDE Tumbleweed 658 MB</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">MX Linux KDE 549 MB</li>
</ul>A difference of only 230 MB between the top and bottom is essentially meaningless. The only people I see worrying about resource consumption are those using 5+ year old hardware. I don&#039;t know what the rest of the world does, but most people buy new hardware every 5 years or so.Hardware compatibility (drivers) is the top priority. Followed by available softs that are properly supported for the distro. Optimizations and speed come later.On the whole, Manjaro seems to be the best balance of them all.Linux running on an EVO 980 and 3990X Threadripper is absurd. You pay $4000 for the system today, and in 10 years it will still be the fastest computer in your city.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mazskolnieces, post: 909195, member: 88422"] Systemd-shim is used. [LIST] [*]Fedora KDE 847 MB [*]Manjaro KDE 714 MB [*]Kubuntu KDE 683 MB [*]OpenSUSE KDE Tumbleweed 658 MB [*]MX Linux KDE 549 MB [/LIST] A difference of only 230 MB between the top and bottom is essentially meaningless. The only people I see worrying about resource consumption are those using 5+ year old hardware. I don't know what the rest of the world does, but most people buy new hardware every 5 years or so. Hardware compatibility (drivers) is the top priority. Followed by available softs that are properly supported for the distro. Optimizations and speed come later. On the whole, Manjaro seems to be the best balance of them all. Linux running on an EVO 980 and 3990X Threadripper is absurd. You pay $4000 for the system today, and in 10 years it will still be the fastest computer in your city. [/QUOTE]

Verification