Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Chrome & Chromium
uBlock Origin MV2 no longer Featured extension in Chrome Web Store
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 1091626" data-attributes="member: 78686"><p>I tested uBO Lite and AdGuard MV3 again and I have to say that they work really well, and most users will not notice any difference at all. They also in my brief test worked faster than MV2 extensions on most sites. I don't know why but it could be down to lack of rules, or it could be due to the fact that for MV2 adblockers, the blocking/modifying requests, etc was done the extension itself. The more optimized it is, the better and faster it was going to be. It seems with the declarative MV3 API for adblockers, the extension tells the browser what to do with network requests and blocking is done by the browser itself which is probably faster. </p><p>With MV2 + DNS based blocking, anything not blocked by the extension would have been blocked by the DNS, with MV3 adblockers, DNS will block/redirect queries to 0.0.0.0 first before they are handled by the extension. So, DNS based blocking IMO is probably more important now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 1091626, member: 78686"] I tested uBO Lite and AdGuard MV3 again and I have to say that they work really well, and most users will not notice any difference at all. They also in my brief test worked faster than MV2 extensions on most sites. I don't know why but it could be down to lack of rules, or it could be due to the fact that for MV2 adblockers, the blocking/modifying requests, etc was done the extension itself. The more optimized it is, the better and faster it was going to be. It seems with the declarative MV3 API for adblockers, the extension tells the browser what to do with network requests and blocking is done by the browser itself which is probably faster. With MV2 + DNS based blocking, anything not blocked by the extension would have been blocked by the DNS, with MV3 adblockers, DNS will block/redirect queries to 0.0.0.0 first before they are handled by the extension. So, DNS based blocking IMO is probably more important now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top