Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Chrome & Chromium
uBlock Origin MV2 no longer Featured extension in Chrome Web Store
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kailyn" data-source="post: 1091721" data-attributes="member: 113651"><p>DIdn't Gorhill discuss this stuff multiple times? Perhaps you are correct and what I thought he discussed are echoes - dust bunnies of the mind - so to speak. In any case, after uMatrix and uBlock Origin, it would make sense that he doesn't really want to do another browser extension.</p><p></p><p>Everyone has to realize that Gorhill is a single point of failure. Once something happens and he is no longer developing, uBO is dead. Even if another developer or a group of developers takes over the extension will never be the same.</p><p></p><p>Once Adguard gets its problems with its Mv3 extension sorted out, I will transition to it. As long as they categorize it as "Experimental" and do not figure out how to fix issues I will not use it.</p><p></p><p>I am willing to bet a lot of money that at some point - whether it is 5 or 10 years - 30,000 rules will not be enough. Google and the entire advertisement ecosystem have a financial interest in undermining any ad blocking. One with a 30,000 rule limit is low-hanging fruit. Can you imagine an ad revolver that randomly utilizes 10, 20, 50 or 100 different methods to display ads? For the advertising ecosystem the costs for doing so keep coming down, way down. Have enough advertisers using this sort of tactic and eventually the ad blockers of today will not be enough.</p><p></p><p>All the complaints about Firefox... are people that stupid? If Firefox provides a virtually ad free experience then why would anybody not use it? If there is any single piece of software that is "geek" and widely adopted, then it is Firefox. Will there be a mass migration to Firefox? Probably not. But I would not be surprised if 10% or 20% of Chrome or Chromium based browsers get hammered so hard by ads that they'll do just about anything to get out of the fishbowl.</p><p></p><p>Who knows. Such trends are difficult to predict with any certainty, but they are possible. All those years ago nobody would ever have though Firefox had a chance. I'd rather be in bed with FIrefox than Chrome.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kailyn, post: 1091721, member: 113651"] DIdn't Gorhill discuss this stuff multiple times? Perhaps you are correct and what I thought he discussed are echoes - dust bunnies of the mind - so to speak. In any case, after uMatrix and uBlock Origin, it would make sense that he doesn't really want to do another browser extension. Everyone has to realize that Gorhill is a single point of failure. Once something happens and he is no longer developing, uBO is dead. Even if another developer or a group of developers takes over the extension will never be the same. Once Adguard gets its problems with its Mv3 extension sorted out, I will transition to it. As long as they categorize it as "Experimental" and do not figure out how to fix issues I will not use it. I am willing to bet a lot of money that at some point - whether it is 5 or 10 years - 30,000 rules will not be enough. Google and the entire advertisement ecosystem have a financial interest in undermining any ad blocking. One with a 30,000 rule limit is low-hanging fruit. Can you imagine an ad revolver that randomly utilizes 10, 20, 50 or 100 different methods to display ads? For the advertising ecosystem the costs for doing so keep coming down, way down. Have enough advertisers using this sort of tactic and eventually the ad blockers of today will not be enough. All the complaints about Firefox... are people that stupid? If Firefox provides a virtually ad free experience then why would anybody not use it? If there is any single piece of software that is "geek" and widely adopted, then it is Firefox. Will there be a mass migration to Firefox? Probably not. But I would not be surprised if 10% or 20% of Chrome or Chromium based browsers get hammered so hard by ads that they'll do just about anything to get out of the fishbowl. Who knows. Such trends are difficult to predict with any certainty, but they are possible. All those years ago nobody would ever have though Firefox had a chance. I'd rather be in bed with FIrefox than Chrome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top