Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gandalf_The_Grey" data-source="post: 1075574" data-attributes="member: 52096">Thanks for this test [USER=26718]@silversurfer[/USER] <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />To answer the questions I had before:Based on this test Chrome and Edge performed the same.Extra security extensions are not really needed, but can help to protect you a little more.Personally I like the safe or not safe indicators on Google or Bing searches.Avira performed the best of the Gen Digital trio and also did great in the latest test of [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] .The move to MV3 will probably not have an impact on the performance of these extensions, seeing the results of Malwarebytes.Malwarebytes and SafeToOpen did both disappoint a little.Best of this test are Bitdefender and McAfee.I will keep the Bitdefender TrafficLight extension installed as I find it more polished than McAfee WebAdvisor.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gandalf_The_Grey, post: 1075574, member: 52096"] Thanks for this test [USER=26718]@silversurfer[/USER] (y) To answer the questions I had before: Based on this test Chrome and Edge performed the same. Extra security extensions are not really needed, but can help to protect you a little more. Personally I like the safe or not safe indicators on Google or Bing searches. Avira performed the best of the Gen Digital trio and also did great in the latest test of [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] . The move to MV3 will probably not have an impact on the performance of these extensions, seeing the results of Malwarebytes. Malwarebytes and SafeToOpen did both disappoint a little. Best of this test are Bitdefender and McAfee. I will keep the Bitdefender TrafficLight extension installed as I find it more polished than McAfee WebAdvisor. [/QUOTE]

Verification