Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 750044" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>Hi [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] , thank you for all your updated tests.</p><p></p><p>Using your dropbox-test-sample, I achieved 25/25 with Pi-Hole.</p><p></p><p>However and to be fair with your test, I used the following computer-on-board tools: K9 (minimum configuration) + Avast AV Free (Web Shield)... and also achieved 25/25 with your dropbox-test-sample.</p><p>That's all, not hosts, neither add-ons.</p><p></p><p>Both, K9 and Avast AV have the less system-impact, with the highest rates of blocking. As far as I know, both are the best combo considering browser performance (RAM, CPU, battery-life, and browser speed). Not to mention that both will work at system level, watching not just 1 browser but 100% of all computer traffic communication.</p><p></p><p>For privacy and ads, a tiny/lightweight 3rd-party blocker does the best job, at almost zero system-impact.</p><p></p><p>I still believe that blocking rates with system-impact, is a zero-sum-game .</p><p></p><p>PS: It is always good to remember, that VTZilla add-on can block 99,99% of malwares. There is no reason anymore to use add-ons with hosts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 750044, member: 67091"] Hi [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] , thank you for all your updated tests. Using your dropbox-test-sample, I achieved 25/25 with Pi-Hole. However and to be fair with your test, I used the following computer-on-board tools: K9 (minimum configuration) + Avast AV Free (Web Shield)... and also achieved 25/25 with your dropbox-test-sample. That's all, not hosts, neither add-ons. Both, K9 and Avast AV have the less system-impact, with the highest rates of blocking. As far as I know, both are the best combo considering browser performance (RAM, CPU, battery-life, and browser speed). Not to mention that both will work at system level, watching not just 1 browser but 100% of all computer traffic communication. For privacy and ads, a tiny/lightweight 3rd-party blocker does the best job, at almost zero system-impact. I still believe that blocking rates with system-impact, is a zero-sum-game . PS: It is always good to remember, that VTZilla add-on can block 99,99% of malwares. There is no reason anymore to use add-ons with hosts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top