Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 58943" data-source="post: 750557"><p>I haven't looked into Kaspersky Free in over a year. Does it offer web filtration in the free product? Kaspersky has one of - if not the best Web Filtration IMO. Coming from Fortinet, that's saying a lot. So Kaspersky will take care of it - but someone that knows more about the free version capabilities may be able to answer that better.</p><p></p><p>FortiClient with JUST the filtration module installed should work with almost any other product. I haven't tested it in this capacity, especially with version 6, but I don't see why it would cause headaches. By operating it in that capacity it would give you one of the top web categorization engines in the world.</p><p></p><p>I personally, rank them;</p><p></p><p>1) Kaspersky (mostly due to the heuristic analysis of traffic)</p><p>2) Fortinet (most due to their resources, engineers, and proactive lab)</p><p>3) Sophos Home Premium (sophos has a strong database, and effective heuristic analysis)</p><p>4) Zvelo (if you can get Zvelo on your network, it's recommended - quite a number of firms use Zvelo now)</p><p>5) Heimdal (mostly due to their DNS protection analysis of URL anomalies)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Anything else I don't consider very good, honestly. Zvelo (at some level) I believe is used by ESET, Untangle, Fireeye, Lookout, GFI, Trend Micro, Total Defense, etc. Interesting, Trend Micro shifted their in-house URL categorization to Zvelo fairly recently. I like Zvelo because of their darkweb scanning of newer threats, proactive updates, and effective categorization methods. I've seen some of their back end.</p><p></p><p>I suppose if one is using a couple of the above in my list they should be fine, and it should encompass 90%+ of every malicious site they'd run into. Personally for me, I use 3 of the above technologies stacked. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /> The chance of rogue malware hitting any of my systems is about 0. The chance of a targeted attack, update channel compromise or sophisticated TAO getting through is where the problem is, and there isn't any real solution to it other than the aforementioned (in another thread), switching to notepads and filing cabinets.</p><p></p><p>FYI: Gryphon Hack Resistant router uses Zvelo as an indirect result of them using ESET technologies at the gateway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 58943, post: 750557"] I haven't looked into Kaspersky Free in over a year. Does it offer web filtration in the free product? Kaspersky has one of - if not the best Web Filtration IMO. Coming from Fortinet, that's saying a lot. So Kaspersky will take care of it - but someone that knows more about the free version capabilities may be able to answer that better. FortiClient with JUST the filtration module installed should work with almost any other product. I haven't tested it in this capacity, especially with version 6, but I don't see why it would cause headaches. By operating it in that capacity it would give you one of the top web categorization engines in the world. I personally, rank them; 1) Kaspersky (mostly due to the heuristic analysis of traffic) 2) Fortinet (most due to their resources, engineers, and proactive lab) 3) Sophos Home Premium (sophos has a strong database, and effective heuristic analysis) 4) Zvelo (if you can get Zvelo on your network, it's recommended - quite a number of firms use Zvelo now) 5) Heimdal (mostly due to their DNS protection analysis of URL anomalies) Anything else I don't consider very good, honestly. Zvelo (at some level) I believe is used by ESET, Untangle, Fireeye, Lookout, GFI, Trend Micro, Total Defense, etc. Interesting, Trend Micro shifted their in-house URL categorization to Zvelo fairly recently. I like Zvelo because of their darkweb scanning of newer threats, proactive updates, and effective categorization methods. I've seen some of their back end. I suppose if one is using a couple of the above in my list they should be fine, and it should encompass 90%+ of every malicious site they'd run into. Personally for me, I use 3 of the above technologies stacked. (y) The chance of rogue malware hitting any of my systems is about 0. The chance of a targeted attack, update channel compromise or sophisticated TAO getting through is where the problem is, and there isn't any real solution to it other than the aforementioned (in another thread), switching to notepads and filing cabinets. FYI: Gryphon Hack Resistant router uses Zvelo as an indirect result of them using ESET technologies at the gateway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
