Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yitworths" data-source="post: 751540" data-attributes="member: 36772"><p>so it does use 127.0.0.1 to port its dns. or something else?</p><p></p><p></p><p>How did you come to notice that, in your router or network adapter settings or through some 3rd party such as website? If your rour network adapter doesn't show any sign of that dns, then probably it's using much better method to handle dns protection. Anyway, I still have a feeling that it relies mostly upon dns level blocking. Not that much on heuristic... dns level blocking ain't that much strong,btw & it's applicable to all not just to heimdal</p><p></p><p></p><p>Kaspersky & Sophos- strong heuristic for sure. Sophos even has great database also. Forticlient has potential, not sure about how strong their heuristic though. BD & avast, mostly rely upon database.For web security database provides backbone for sure but without strong heuristic it useless against emerging threats. Every now & then, new domain is being spawned (registered or unregistered), it's unlikely that only database will provide immunity against newly appeared domain which is actually a mal-domain.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, great work mate<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite140" alt=":emoji_beer:" title="Beer :emoji_beer:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":emoji_beer:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yitworths, post: 751540, member: 36772"] so it does use 127.0.0.1 to port its dns. or something else? How did you come to notice that, in your router or network adapter settings or through some 3rd party such as website? If your rour network adapter doesn't show any sign of that dns, then probably it's using much better method to handle dns protection. Anyway, I still have a feeling that it relies mostly upon dns level blocking. Not that much on heuristic... dns level blocking ain't that much strong,btw & it's applicable to all not just to heimdal Kaspersky & Sophos- strong heuristic for sure. Sophos even has great database also. Forticlient has potential, not sure about how strong their heuristic though. BD & avast, mostly rely upon database.For web security database provides backbone for sure but without strong heuristic it useless against emerging threats. Every now & then, new domain is being spawned (registered or unregistered), it's unlikely that only database will provide immunity against newly appeared domain which is actually a mal-domain. Anyway, great work mate(y):emoji_beer: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top