Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Windows_Security" data-source="post: 763149" data-attributes="member: 50782"><p>URL blocking is a numbers game.</p><p></p><p>Google and Microsoft should do well because they simply see the most traffic. Corporate clients oriented UTM suppliers (Fortinet, Sophos, Symantec) and DNS networks (Neustar/Cisco/Comodo/Quad9) also 'see' a lot of traffic as with largest AV-vendors (Bitdefender, AVAST/AVG and Kaspersky).</p><p></p><p>In the past we could smartly stack/pile some vendors: a (free) DNS service, your AntiVirus and browser of choice, topped with an extension. Unfortunately the tests of [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] show that using different layers in different phases of the network stack, is not worth the effort anymore.</p><p></p><p>Based on these disappointing test results I returned to using my browser's URL filter only, no blocking extensions and back to ISP's DNS service.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite111" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> But I will keep monitoring this thread, just in case stacking up is beneficial again <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Windows_Security, post: 763149, member: 50782"] URL blocking is a numbers game. Google and Microsoft should do well because they simply see the most traffic. Corporate clients oriented UTM suppliers (Fortinet, Sophos, Symantec) and DNS networks (Neustar/Cisco/Comodo/Quad9) also 'see' a lot of traffic as with largest AV-vendors (Bitdefender, AVAST/AVG and Kaspersky). In the past we could smartly stack/pile some vendors: a (free) DNS service, your AntiVirus and browser of choice, topped with an extension. Unfortunately the tests of [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] show that using different layers in different phases of the network stack, is not worth the effort anymore. Based on these disappointing test results I returned to using my browser's URL filter only, no blocking extensions and back to ISP's DNS service.:( But I will keep monitoring this thread, just in case stacking up is beneficial again :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top