Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 764383" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>k9 has a huge database, more than most vendors, I assume, besides fortinet, kaspersky, eset,...</p><p>K9 and malwarebytes have heuristics engine, which can detect and block unknown malicious websites, in exchange of high rate of False positive. Not many vendors have it</p><p>ublock only block blacklisted websites by third-party filter lists. It fully relies on filters => not as good as a dedicated webfilter. Ublock itself doesn't have any malware filter engine</p><p></p><p>ublock is designed to be an adblocker, not a malware/phishing blocker</p><p>the advantage is you can whatever filter you want (hundreds, millions) so it can sometimes be better than many webfilter such as heimdal/Thor as I demonstrated in some of my tests</p><p>I doubt heimdal uses hphosts and their own engine for webfilter because most of the time, heimdal misses very similar links compared to hphosts</p><p></p><p>k9 is a system-wise webfilter, we all know system-wise webfilter usually can cause problem for people</p><p>ublock is an extension, it doesn't cause as many problems</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 764383, member: 51905"] k9 has a huge database, more than most vendors, I assume, besides fortinet, kaspersky, eset,... K9 and malwarebytes have heuristics engine, which can detect and block unknown malicious websites, in exchange of high rate of False positive. Not many vendors have it ublock only block blacklisted websites by third-party filter lists. It fully relies on filters => not as good as a dedicated webfilter. Ublock itself doesn't have any malware filter engine ublock is designed to be an adblocker, not a malware/phishing blocker the advantage is you can whatever filter you want (hundreds, millions) so it can sometimes be better than many webfilter such as heimdal/Thor as I demonstrated in some of my tests I doubt heimdal uses hphosts and their own engine for webfilter because most of the time, heimdal misses very similar links compared to hphosts k9 is a system-wise webfilter, we all know system-wise webfilter usually can cause problem for people ublock is an extension, it doesn't cause as many problems [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top