Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 764396" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>My main concerns about the tests with 2/3 dead links are as follows:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Is it true that most of those dead links were malicious?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Is it true that if 2/3 links are dead then most of the live links are hacked legal websites?</li> </ol><p>I have the bad feeling that the answers to both questions may be positive. If so, then we do not know the real detection score for most malicious websites. Such tests can be easily questioned.</p><p>On the other side, the tests with 0-day links are not so useful, because the chance to follow such link by the user is negligible.</p><p>I do not know which test procedure could be optimal. Maybe few-day-old links with maximum 1/3 dead links?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 764396, member: 32260"] My main concerns about the tests with 2/3 dead links are as follows: [LIST=1] [*]Is it true that most of those dead links were malicious? [*]Is it true that if 2/3 links are dead then most of the live links are hacked legal websites? [/LIST] I have the bad feeling that the answers to both questions may be positive. If so, then we do not know the real detection score for most malicious websites. Such tests can be easily questioned. On the other side, the tests with 0-day links are not so useful, because the chance to follow such link by the user is negligible. I do not know which test procedure could be optimal. Maybe few-day-old links with maximum 1/3 dead links? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
