Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 764475" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>I know that's a fact but I don't believe in those because people use their computer differently</p><p></p><p>I also know default-deny can protect upto 100% with ~zero resource usage, a fact too but they are not for average users. Even when we setup a default-deny solution with exclusions for them, they won't satisfy because it blocks their NEW safe programs</p><p></p><p>I tested these for myself, to setup for other people, and for people who are interested</p><p></p><p>for very knowledgeable users, my tests are useless, I know that, same for MT hub</p><p></p><p>extensions can contribute to a default-deny-based setup that users will have to deal with less malwares touching their HDD</p><p>for example, if there is only 1 anti-exe on the PC, the users will have to make decision on every single file they just download and it takes time to verify their safety</p><p>if there are 1 or 2 default-allow solutions on top of that, they will block 90-95% of those malicious files and the users only have to make decision on 5-10% of the malicious files + safe files</p><p>I choose the default-deny + default-allow because I have absolutely no trust on default-deny only</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 764475, member: 51905"] I know that's a fact but I don't believe in those because people use their computer differently I also know default-deny can protect upto 100% with ~zero resource usage, a fact too but they are not for average users. Even when we setup a default-deny solution with exclusions for them, they won't satisfy because it blocks their NEW safe programs I tested these for myself, to setup for other people, and for people who are interested for very knowledgeable users, my tests are useless, I know that, same for MT hub extensions can contribute to a default-deny-based setup that users will have to deal with less malwares touching their HDD for example, if there is only 1 anti-exe on the PC, the users will have to make decision on every single file they just download and it takes time to verify their safety if there are 1 or 2 default-allow solutions on top of that, they will block 90-95% of those malicious files and the users only have to make decision on 5-10% of the malicious files + safe files I choose the default-deny + default-allow because I have absolutely no trust on default-deny only [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top