Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Burrito" data-source="post: 811244" data-attributes="member: 72439"><p>Yeah, advanced uBO can do so many things... when I first started digging into it, it seemed complicated and beyond my willingness to learn. But then it slowly sank in... it can be really powerful. uBO can be designed as default-deny in its strictest mode. It is impractical though, as this means that most web pages would be broken... just like strict NoScript.</p><p></p><p>When I used NoScript years ago, I loved it at first. I thought it was great that all scripts need permission to run. </p><p></p><p>After a while though, I got tired of 'gaming' every website to see what I had to turn off and could leave on for the website to function properly. It gave me security fatigue. And even though clearly I was safer with it... I dumped it. </p><p></p><p>Usability matters.</p><p></p><p>If a big white list were developed, I can see where that would negate some of the safety that NoScript brings.</p><p></p><p>Although I'm mildly interested to see how it does in Chrome, I'm probably not willing to mess with it that much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Burrito, post: 811244, member: 72439"] Yeah, advanced uBO can do so many things... when I first started digging into it, it seemed complicated and beyond my willingness to learn. But then it slowly sank in... it can be really powerful. uBO can be designed as default-deny in its strictest mode. It is impractical though, as this means that most web pages would be broken... just like strict NoScript. When I used NoScript years ago, I loved it at first. I thought it was great that all scripts need permission to run. After a while though, I got tired of 'gaming' every website to see what I had to turn off and could leave on for the website to function properly. It gave me security fatigue. And even though clearly I was safer with it... I dumped it. Usability matters. If a big white list were developed, I can see where that would negate some of the safety that NoScript brings. Although I'm mildly interested to see how it does in Chrome, I'm probably not willing to mess with it that much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top