Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="goodjohnjr" data-source="post: 827370" data-attributes="member: 73546">Hello Evjl&#039;s Rain,They are definitely lighter and have improved as you have done these tests.I am disappointed that Emsisoft Browser Security has not been improving and has not even been updated in a while, and I hope that this trend improves before it becomes like the Comodo extension(s).I remember the Avira extension being the heaviest in RAM usage at least back when I tried it last year, it and the Malwarebytes extension have a lot of potential, but they do need to improve in that area. (Avira would probably benefit from using Ublock Origin&#039;s codebase for adblocking, and so would Malwarebytes which has the worst adblocking of the two)Malwarebytes has several bugs that still have not been fixed, Emsisoft still has a bug, Bitdefender has several bugs, et cetera; and so I hope that each of them will fix those eventually.Thank you for responding,-John Jr</blockquote>

[QUOTE="goodjohnjr, post: 827370, member: 73546"] Hello Evjl's Rain, They are definitely lighter and have improved as you have done these tests. I am disappointed that Emsisoft Browser Security has not been improving and has not even been updated in a while, and I hope that this trend improves before it becomes like the Comodo extension(s). I remember the Avira extension being the heaviest in RAM usage at least back when I tried it last year, it and the Malwarebytes extension have a lot of potential, but they do need to improve in that area. (Avira would probably benefit from using Ublock Origin's codebase for adblocking, and so would Malwarebytes which has the worst adblocking of the two) Malwarebytes has several bugs that still have not been fixed, Emsisoft still has a bug, Bitdefender has several bugs, et cetera; and so I hope that each of them will fix those eventually. Thank you for responding, -John Jr [/QUOTE]

Verification