Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
VoodooShield 6 - December 2020 Report
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mazskolnieces" data-source="post: 922858" data-attributes="member: 88422"><p>Kaspersky stated that they removed TAM because very, very few home consumers used this default deny feature. Plus, Kaspersky support got tired of all the home user support requests because they don't read the manual, don't follow security advice and cannot handle security alerts. That's why Interactive Mode was removed as well. Based upon some discussions there was mention of reducing and optimizing code across Kaspersky products as well. If you look at what Kaspersky is doing, it is obvious that they are moving in the direction of as much automation for consumers as makes security sense, but sticking to the traditional multi-layered approach for enterprise.</p><p></p><p>Actually, Application Control is already pretty much default deny with optimal configuration for the typical user. You're already aware of those optimizations.</p><p></p><p>You can ask Dmitry, Yury or any of the other mods on the Kaspersky forums. If you ask the right questions, they'll get you the same answers from product management as above.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mazskolnieces, post: 922858, member: 88422"] Kaspersky stated that they removed TAM because very, very few home consumers used this default deny feature. Plus, Kaspersky support got tired of all the home user support requests because they don't read the manual, don't follow security advice and cannot handle security alerts. That's why Interactive Mode was removed as well. Based upon some discussions there was mention of reducing and optimizing code across Kaspersky products as well. If you look at what Kaspersky is doing, it is obvious that they are moving in the direction of as much automation for consumers as makes security sense, but sticking to the traditional multi-layered approach for enterprise. Actually, Application Control is already pretty much default deny with optimal configuration for the typical user. You're already aware of those optimizations. You can ask Dmitry, Yury or any of the other mods on the Kaspersky forums. If you ask the right questions, they'll get you the same answers from product management as above. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top