Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 923004" data-attributes="member: 62850">Hehehe, I KNEW you were going to say that <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.&nbsp; I actually downloaded that installer from a client&#039;s server, and installed the old version on purpose to make sure TAM was not removed... because I distinctly remember comparing VS to what I thought was TAM when we first installed it at that location.&nbsp; Anyway, they are running the latest version of Kaspersky now.BTW, you mentioned that you do not disagree with ... &quot;I do not seem to agree whether the computer should be locked when it is at risk or not&quot;.It took me several days to process... My mind is on a single core P133, but I was curious about something.&nbsp; Do you think it is beneficial to increase the security posture when the user is engaged in dangerous activities?&nbsp; Like running a web browser or email client?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="danb, post: 923004, member: 62850"] Hehehe, I KNEW you were going to say that ;). I actually downloaded that installer from a client's server, and installed the old version on purpose to make sure TAM was not removed... because I distinctly remember comparing VS to what I thought was TAM when we first installed it at that location. Anyway, they are running the latest version of Kaspersky now. BTW, you mentioned that you do not disagree with ... "I do not seem to agree whether the computer should be locked when it is at risk or not". It took me several days to process... My mind is on a single core P133, but I was curious about something. Do you think it is beneficial to increase the security posture when the user is engaged in dangerous activities? Like running a web browser or email client? [/QUOTE]

Verification