Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 95367" data-source="post: 1010093">Where is your evidence? Microsoft&#039;s own experience prove the exact opposite. Gartner&#039;s own statistics say otherwise. Perhaps you should spend the $10,000 to get the data before you make claims, that as it turns out, are incorrect. Microsoft has stated that its experience locking down Windows with S mode was so good that is moving forward to replicate Windows S mode via Smart Application control.The number 1 reason for enterprise breaches are user error = misconfiguration. The number 1 reason for consumer breaches = users that want to use stuff do things that they should not. These facts are common knowledge.All one need do is search through this very forum and look at the numerous times that even regular VS ussers - who are security geeks - have to ask questions because they cannot figure out the product or they don&#039;t know what decision to make. And that has nothing to do with the product being beta.There&#039;s a reason that outfits such as Kaspersky remove by default the need for the user to make decisions - because users can&#039;t handle making decisions. Everybody knows this. It is common knowledge.Uhm, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no and nope.Who is Jeff T? You sure do obsess about this individual. You&#039;ve posted some variation on &quot;this person is Jeff T&quot; a total of 63 times. That&#039;s not just unhealthy. It is uber creepy. Just sayin&#039;.And uhm, VS&#039;s only competitors are NoVirusThanks and Faronics.This is a public forum. There is nothing inappropriate about anyone posting on it. You just make up imaginary rules as you go along. If you can&#039;t handle interactions on the internet, then perhaps it is time to consider staying off forums and social media?Dynamic security postures are nothing new. Products have adapted their security posture when connecting to a untrused network or when an untrusted user logs-in for decades.Yeah. It is called DEFCON as a &quot;catchy&quot; name, but the whole symposium was started early in the bug bounty days - to encourage and reward vulnerability hunting and exploits, and Capture-the-Flag events. DEFCON has nothing to do with dynamic security postures and it sure doesn&#039;t exist to perpetuate your &quot; computer lock. &quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 95367, post: 1010093"] Where is your evidence? Microsoft's own experience prove the exact opposite. Gartner's own statistics say otherwise. Perhaps you should spend the $10,000 to get the data before you make claims, that as it turns out, are incorrect. Microsoft has stated that its experience locking down Windows with S mode was so good that is moving forward to replicate Windows S mode via Smart Application control. The number 1 reason for enterprise breaches are user error = misconfiguration. The number 1 reason for consumer breaches = users that want to use stuff do things that they should not. These facts are common knowledge. All one need do is search through this very forum and look at the numerous times that even regular VS ussers - who are security geeks - have to ask questions because they cannot figure out the product or they don't know what decision to make. And that has nothing to do with the product being beta. There's a reason that outfits such as Kaspersky remove by default the need for the user to make decisions - because users can't handle making decisions. Everybody knows this. It is common knowledge. Uhm, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no and nope. Who is Jeff T? You sure do obsess about this individual. You've posted some variation on "this person is Jeff T" a total of 63 times. That's not just unhealthy. It is uber creepy. Just sayin'. And uhm, VS's only competitors are NoVirusThanks and Faronics. This is a public forum. There is nothing inappropriate about anyone posting on it. You just make up imaginary rules as you go along. If you can't handle interactions on the internet, then perhaps it is time to consider staying off forums and social media? Dynamic security postures are nothing new. Products have adapted their security posture when connecting to a untrused network or when an untrusted user logs-in for decades. Yeah. It is called DEFCON as a "catchy" name, but the whole symposium was started early in the bug bounty days - to encourage and reward vulnerability hunting and exploits, and Capture-the-Flag events. DEFCON has nothing to do with dynamic security postures and it sure doesn't exist to perpetuate your " computer lock. " [/QUOTE]

Verification