Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oldie1950" data-source="post: 1069690" data-attributes="member: 94738">CyberLock is not designed as business software. Therefore, you cannot put it on the same level as Checkpoint’s EDR software. Dan claims that his software should also be usable for private users with little computer knowledge. It should therefore (this is of course just my opinion) have a clearer user interface. By this I expressly do not mean the “dumbing down” that you mentioned. Of course, all the functions required for a good effect should be present under the user interface. They just don&#039;t need to be visible in the many options in the current interface. When I drive a car, I don&#039;t want to constantly look into the engine compartment. I think it&#039;s really worth considering offering two versions with different user interfaces. One version for advanced users and another version for the common consumer.I see you as an advanced user. So you probably have a different perspective than me.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oldie1950, post: 1069690, member: 94738"] CyberLock is not designed as business software. Therefore, you cannot put it on the same level as Checkpoint’s EDR software. Dan claims that his software should also be usable for private users with little computer knowledge. It should therefore (this is of course just my opinion) have a clearer user interface. By this I expressly do not mean the “dumbing down” that you mentioned. Of course, all the functions required for a good effect should be present under the user interface. They just don't need to be visible in the many options in the current interface. When I drive a car, I don't want to constantly look into the engine compartment. I think it's really worth considering offering two versions with different user interfaces. One version for advanced users and another version for the common consumer. I see you as an advanced user. So you probably have a different perspective than me. [/QUOTE]

Verification