Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
VoodooShield
VoodooShield CyberLock 7.0
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 1074303" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>Thank you for the info, there are a total of 2 bocks in your Developer Log.</p><p></p><p>1) surunext.dll block - this is blocked because it is a Windows Control Panel applet that is not native to Windows. CyberLock is correct in blocking any non-native control panel applets. Simply allow the command line block once and you are good to go. I allowed this block on my test machine earlier today, and just to test, fired up that machine again, and it is being properly and automatically allowed.</p><p></p><p>2) w32time block – same here, this item needs to be blocked and manually allowed by the user the first time it runs. It should not be blocked after that.</p><p></p><p>All you need to do is to go into the Command Lines tab in CyberLock Settings and right click each of the two items and choose Allow one time, then they should be automatically allowed in the future. Or you can simply click allow in the user prompt when they are blocked.</p><p></p><p>On a side note, I have to reset my whitelist and command lines quite often for testing purposes. Each time I do, I have to manually allow one command line block from the backup software I use. I could hardwire that item into CyberLock, but why add it if it only affects a small handful of users?</p><p></p><p>We are both triggering SuRun the same (with a right click in Windows Explorer), so we are good to go there.</p><p></p><p>If these are the only two blocks, then CyberLock is performing exactly as expected. In fact, if CyberLock did not initially block these two items, then your computer would not be properly protected.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 1074303, member: 62850"] Thank you for the info, there are a total of 2 bocks in your Developer Log. 1) surunext.dll block - this is blocked because it is a Windows Control Panel applet that is not native to Windows. CyberLock is correct in blocking any non-native control panel applets. Simply allow the command line block once and you are good to go. I allowed this block on my test machine earlier today, and just to test, fired up that machine again, and it is being properly and automatically allowed. 2) w32time block – same here, this item needs to be blocked and manually allowed by the user the first time it runs. It should not be blocked after that. All you need to do is to go into the Command Lines tab in CyberLock Settings and right click each of the two items and choose Allow one time, then they should be automatically allowed in the future. Or you can simply click allow in the user prompt when they are blocked. On a side note, I have to reset my whitelist and command lines quite often for testing purposes. Each time I do, I have to manually allow one command line block from the backup software I use. I could hardwire that item into CyberLock, but why add it if it only affects a small handful of users? We are both triggering SuRun the same (with a right click in Windows Explorer), so we are good to go there. If these are the only two blocks, then CyberLock is performing exactly as expected. In fact, if CyberLock did not initially block these two items, then your computer would not be properly protected. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top