Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1109771" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>There is a piracy software that is clean but because of its behavior is detected by almost every av on virus total yet Kaspersky correctly catagorized it as clean&nbsp; although it had only around 100 endpoints with that software and there are many similar examples I have seen so there is not a single av that can compete on the accuracy of marking shady stuff with low userbase&nbsp; accurately and will be excellent if Kaspersky opentip wouldn&#039;t be trusted by default so there will be a clean&nbsp; +&nbsp; certain confidence of voodooshield&nbsp; and there is a lot danb can play with it to mix security and false positives rate by having Kaspersky as a added whitelist and advanced users could either force Kaspersky clean to be forced whitelisted (lower false positive) or increasing the confidence requirement of voodooshield when there is clean catagory (increase security)</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1109771, member: 57714"] There is a piracy software that is clean but because of its behavior is detected by almost every av on virus total yet Kaspersky correctly catagorized it as clean although it had only around 100 endpoints with that software and there are many similar examples I have seen so there is not a single av that can compete on the accuracy of marking shady stuff with low userbase accurately and will be excellent if Kaspersky opentip wouldn't be trusted by default so there will be a clean + certain confidence of voodooshield and there is a lot danb can play with it to mix security and false positives rate by having Kaspersky as a added whitelist and advanced users could either force Kaspersky clean to be forced whitelisted (lower false positive) or increasing the confidence requirement of voodooshield when there is clean catagory (increase security) [/QUOTE]

Verification