Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 866523" data-attributes="member: 62850">[USER=86050]@BVLon[/USER] I agree that our graphic design needs serious attention all around, and we will certainly address that soon.&nbsp; I also agree that at some point we should consider a trial version and rework the Free / Pro features, but it is working well for us for now, so while these are all items that need to be addressed, I am more concerned with a few other items, listed below.From one of your previous posts, it appears that you genuinely understand&nbsp; the concept of VS, and that it is basically a tangible computer lock that offers dynamic levels of protection / security postures, and essentially locks the computer when it is at risk.&nbsp; A lot of people do not understand this core concept, so I am quite excited to see what suggestions you might have regarding the usability and protection capabilities of our toggling lock / dynamic levels of protection tech.&nbsp; A lot of users have offered suggestions along the way that has had a big positive impact on VS&#039;s usability and protection, so I would love to hear even more suggestions on how we can continue to refine VS.It might help to think in the following terms.&nbsp; Take any traditional or next gen AV (including Windows Defender) and add an additional layer of protection that automatically locks the computer with dynamic levels of protection when it is at risk, and only allows the items on the tiny, customized whitelist while the user is engaged in risky activity.&nbsp; Then when the user is not engaged in risky activities, VS can be safely building the tiny, customized whitelist in the background so that the next time VS automatically toggles to a more aggressive level of protection, it will have automatically learned what safe items not to block.&nbsp; In other words, imagine your favorite traditional or next gen AV, then imagine it had the capability to automatically toggle to a more aggressive security posture when you are engaging in risky activity.&nbsp; That is what we are aiming for.&nbsp; I look forward to your suggestions, thank you!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="danb, post: 866523, member: 62850"] [USER=86050]@BVLon[/USER] I agree that our graphic design needs serious attention all around, and we will certainly address that soon. I also agree that at some point we should consider a trial version and rework the Free / Pro features, but it is working well for us for now, so while these are all items that need to be addressed, I am more concerned with a few other items, listed below. From one of your previous posts, it appears that you genuinely understand the concept of VS, and that it is basically a tangible computer lock that offers dynamic levels of protection / security postures, and essentially locks the computer when it is at risk. A lot of people do not understand this core concept, so I am quite excited to see what suggestions you might have regarding the usability and protection capabilities of our toggling lock / dynamic levels of protection tech. A lot of users have offered suggestions along the way that has had a big positive impact on VS's usability and protection, so I would love to hear even more suggestions on how we can continue to refine VS. It might help to think in the following terms. Take any traditional or next gen AV (including Windows Defender) and add an additional layer of protection that automatically locks the computer with dynamic levels of protection when it is at risk, and only allows the items on the tiny, customized whitelist while the user is engaged in risky activity. Then when the user is not engaged in risky activities, VS can be safely building the tiny, customized whitelist in the background so that the next time VS automatically toggles to a more aggressive level of protection, it will have automatically learned what safe items not to block. In other words, imagine your favorite traditional or next gen AV, then imagine it had the capability to automatically toggle to a more aggressive security posture when you are engaging in risky activity. That is what we are aiming for. I look forward to your suggestions, thank you! [/QUOTE]

Verification