Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
VoodooShield
VoodooShield Review by PCMag India
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 867787" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>Maybe "Close your</p><p></p><p>Yes, in general they do, I have seen this countless times in person. A user will click the Yes UAC button and say out loud "yes, I want to allow you"... kind of in a frustrated / uppity tone. The reason for this is simple... UAC was not designed or built to be a security mechanism, and even Microsoft has admitted this. UAC was designed for force devs to not run everything as admin.</p><p></p><p>I remember being extremely excited for Vista to come out because I had heard of the new feature known as UAC, and I was hopeful that it would reduce infections. But when I saw how it was implemented and realized that it was not designed to be a security mechanism, I was quite disappointed. This was obviously a few years before VS, and probably in a strange way led me to the idea for VS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 867787, member: 62850"] Maybe "Close your Yes, in general they do, I have seen this countless times in person. A user will click the Yes UAC button and say out loud "yes, I want to allow you"... kind of in a frustrated / uppity tone. The reason for this is simple... UAC was not designed or built to be a security mechanism, and even Microsoft has admitted this. UAC was designed for force devs to not run everything as admin. I remember being extremely excited for Vista to come out because I had heard of the new feature known as UAC, and I was hopeful that it would reduce infections. But when I saw how it was implemented and realized that it was not designed to be a security mechanism, I was quite disappointed. This was obviously a few years before VS, and probably in a strange way led me to the idea for VS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
